![]() ![]() The University of California and the California State University systems are prohibited from using race as an admissions factor under a ballot measure approved by voters in 1996. The impact of the rulings is likely to be limited in California, however. The vote was 6 to 3 in the North Carolina case and 6 to 2 in the Harvard case, from which Jackson, a former member of Harvard’s Board of Overseers, recused herself.Īffirmative action, like abortion, has been a target of the conservative legal movement for decades, and the court’s liberal precedents on these two major issues were put in danger when President Trump and Senate Republicans succeeded in appointing three new justices. In other words, the student must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual - not on the basis of race.” Or a benefit to a student whose heritage or culture motivated him or her to assume a leadership role or attain a particular goal must be tied to that student’s unique ability to contribute to the university. ![]() “A benefit to a student who overcame racial discrimination, for example, must be tied to that student’s courage and determination. “Nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant’s discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise,” Roberts wrote. ![]() School officials are likely to focus on a passage near the end of the chief justice’s 40-page opinion: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |